Ask around for a good forex signal provider and you'll get a name, usually followed by a screenshot of a win streak. Screenshots are the wrong evidence. A win streak from an account nobody else can see, cropped to whatever window makes it look best, tells you nothing about whether the method behind it holds up. There's a shorter, more useful list of things to actually check first.

What to check before paying anyone
- Is the track record public and unedited? Not a highlights reel of the winners. If losses are missing, absent, or quietly deleted, the record you're looking at isn't a record: it's marketing.
- Are calls timestamped before the move, not after? A published time that precedes the price action is the only way to know a call wasn't written with the outcome already known.
- Is the method actually named? "Our proprietary algorithm" is not a method. A provider willing to say exactly what a level is measured from, whether a specific indicator or a specific swing, is a provider willing to be checked.
- Does it separate direction from execution? A market bias and an actual position with an entry, target and stop are different claims. A provider collapsing both into one vague call is hiding where the real risk sits.
- Is there a stated risk framework, not a dollar figure? Nobody outside your account knows your account size. A provider handing out lot sizes or dollar amounts is guessing at your risk tolerance, not managing it.
- What happens after you pay? Refund policy, cancellation terms, and whether you can leave whenever you want should be stated plainly, not buried in a support ticket after the fact.
The single biggest tell
Almost every bad provider fails on the same point: an unverifiable record. If wins and losses both aren't sitting in the same public place, permanently, there is no way to separate a genuine edge from a run of luck that got screenshotted at the right moment. A provider confident enough to leave losses up, in the same feed as the wins, is telling you something a highlight reel never will.
A track record you can't verify isn't a track record. It's a claim, and claims are free to make.
Where free signals fit into this
Free channels change the calculus further, because there's usually no accountability mechanism at all: no seat to lose, nothing at stake for the person posting if the call is wrong. What that actually costs you as a reader is covered in free forex signals vs. a paid EUR/USD desk. And if you want to see what an unedited public record actually looks like in practice, wins and losses both, it's laid out in why we publish losses too.